Post
by ping00 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:28 pm
Whoever is doing that, as I said, has plenty of opportunity to have raised their various obsessions with me out in the open. It's a small class and everyone's known who everyone else is for the last two years just about.
Why should I have to compete with someone so dangerously insane that they couldn't even make a formal complaint that they have issues with another person raising a perfectly acceptable complaint about disruptive noise levels - instead they copy my username here badly, and use it to launch a series of personal hatreds my way.
Nobody said anything in class today. They could have admitted it was them then. So now I have had to go raise their drama with lecturers here, as well as having to contact the course leader at Napier about it also, which I'd done as soon as realising they are sitting there in class harbouring all kinds of grudges against me.
They claim I cost people extra money for asking for a quiet room during exams. I didn't ask for a room at a different campus. At any rate, I don't think anybody comes from the Gourock end on the train or bus, so it would have actually been one stop cheaper to get off at the other campus where the exam was.
I didn't complain about the other things the psycho mentions, to do with the classroom being too hot etc, the last two years. Plenty of other people did - I wouldn't dream of harbouring the kinds of psychosis against them that idiot has with me, just because it might not have bothered me as much as it did them. I wouldn't have had issues if we moved classes because of it - that would be unreasonable, just like expecting anyone to study and learn with construction noise going on is unreasonable.
It also (in a pm at least) has claimed that the campus the exam was held in was noisier. It wasn't, there wasn't any noise there at all. It's a much better environment all round; it's a pity we aren't there for every class.
Besides, whoever it is doesn't have the balls to have said any of this to me in the first place. They rely on this forum being anonymous and not linked to them directly. They know who I am! I don't know who they are - yet.
Their issues with me can't be reasonably explained anyway. You can't have issues against someone because they themselves put in formal complaints about unacceptable teaching conditions. It's not like I'm the only person there (teachers and pupils) that is aware of how unacceptable that situation is.
As for any extra couple of quid travel tickets possibly-maybe might have cost; that ought to be covered by travel expenses?! When I had to get a train to Uni a good few years ago, I bought a travelcard. So did everyone else that got a train or bus. It covers you for all journeys using the same line, which is applicable in this case. If travel expenses still work the same way as they did then, then you aren't able to claim any of them unless you bought the cheapest possible ticket - eg a travelcard.
Whoever that is, is some thug (in their imagination at least) that thinks they can bully me into not complaining about the noise. They think I should put up with the kinds of things they are trying to lay at me, as if I'm the one causing problems and being irresponsible at how others are affected.
That's the entire basis of why there shouldn't be the noise - or uncomfortable environments - to begin with.
Their pm to me here was entitled 'You' - they are insane and have been in class / the same course for two years and some weeks, and there's not been a peep from anyone that such undercurrents are around. If I had problems with anyone in the class, they heard all about it from me directly first. I'm not a sicko freak that sits there hating on anyone in silence nursing an ulcer, and doing underhanded things like that nutjob is up to here.
What sort of person is that. What if they get put in the same group as me for the group project next term - I have a right to know who they are. What options do I have - treat everyone badly just in case it's they who are responsible? I won't let them have that sicko effect. Cause, I don't think given the type of person they are that they will admit it is them doing this, if I ask. It also means I have to seem to be accusing others of being the psycho.
That was their first words in their pm - 'how are you going to find out who I am'.
They're a sick little game playing deviant. You know, I also think they reckon they can use this hoohah they've started to force some sort of friendship with me out of it. That won't be happening; the best they'll get from me will be the cold shoulder.
They're exactly the reason anyone gets the irresponsible idea it's ok to have disruptions going on during lessons. All that underhanded effort they've put in to attacking me for doing the right thing and standing up against unacceptable studying conditions; some hired shill type crawler is all they are.
Plus they can't spell or use syntax to save their miserable life, and don't seem able to follow a coherent sentence either.
not ping